08
2026
-
01
The Universal EV Charging Port "Codebook"
Source:
The Universal EV Charging Port "Codebook": The Evolution of Charging Connectors—From Chaos to Regional "Secret Codes"
Ever traveled abroad by car, excitedly found a charging station, only to realize the charging gun doesn’t "match the code" with your car’s port? It’s not your fault—these "codes" for EV charging ports were gradually "argued out" and "tested" as countries developed their electric vehicle industries.

1. First, let’s clarify: Why are charging ports so chaotic? (The Starting Point)
When early EVs were just emerging, there was no unified port standard at all: Manufacturer A used a 3-pin round port, Manufacturer B used a 4-pin square one, and charging felt like "guessing a blind box." It wasn’t until the 2000s, as EVs scaled up, that countries began rolling out regionally unified standards—after all, a common port is the only way for chargers and cars to "communicate."
Across all standards, ports fall into two basic categories:
AC (Slow Charging): Common for home/public slow chargers, low-power and slow, usually "round multi-pin" ports.
DC (Fast Charging): Common for highway rest stop/fast-charging stations, high-power and fast, typically "combined top-bottom" ports (the top handles fast charging, the bottom is compatible with slow charging).
2. Regional "Codebooks": The Evolution of Each Standard
1. North America: J1772 (AC) + CCS1 (DC) — "Slow Charging First, Fast Charging Later"
North America was one of the first regions to standardize ports:
In 2001, the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) launched the J1772 (Type 1) AC port, a 5-pin round design that ended early manufacturer chaos and became the "universal key" for North American slow charging.
In 2011, as fast-charging demand boomed, the industry added two large current pins to J1772 to create CCS1 (North American fast-charging standard)—essentially "slow-charging port + fast-charging expansion." Most North American EVs now use this.
2. Japan: J1772 (AC) + CHAdeMO (DC) — "Fast Charging First, a Unique Path"
Japan was a "pioneer" in EV fast charging:
It adopted North America’s J1772 for slow charging (thanks to early technical exchanges).
In 2009, Japanese automakers like Nissan and Mitsubishi jointly launched CHAdeMO (Japanese fast-charging standard), a port marked with a "cross symbol" that was widely used for early models like the Nissan Leaf. However, its market share has since declined due to poor regional compatibility.
3. EU & Rest of World: Mennekes (AC) + CCS2 (DC) — "A Unified European Standard"
To avoid "one standard per country," the EU took a "strong unification" approach:
In 2009, the EU launched Mennekes (Type 2) AC port, a 7-pin round design (2 more pins than J1772, supporting higher power), which became the mandatory slow-charging standard for all European EVs.
In 2014, it upgraded Type 2 to CCS2 (European fast-charging standard), integrating slow and fast charging into one port. Today, nearly all European brands (from Volkswagen to Porsche) use CCS2, fully unifying Europe’s charging "code."
4. China: GB/T (AC + DC) — "Latecomer but Self-Reliant & Unified"
China’s early EV ports were also chaotic (e.g., some models used CHAdeMO), but it quickly adopted an "independent national standard":
In 2015, the GB/T 20234 series of standards was officially implemented, unifying China’s GB/T AC port (7-pin) and GB/T DC port (7-pin top + 2-pin bottom). Drawing on international experience while adapting to domestic EV tech needs, this "national code" is now universal for all Chinese chargers and new EVs.
5. Tesla: Exclusive Port — "Doing Its Own Thing"
Tesla initially refused to follow regional standards and developed its exclusive port (a "dual-circle + small contacts" design) that supports both slow and fast charging. Later, to adapt to markets, it launched adapters (e.g., Tesla cars in China can plug directly into GB/T ports)—a flexible mix of "exclusive code + universal compatibility."
3. Key Takeaway: Avoid Charging Pitfalls Abroad
North America/Japan: Bring CCS1/CHAdeMO adapters.
Europe: Use CCS2 directly (most chargers support it).
China: GB/T ports work for all—no worries.
From "chaotic random plugging" to "regional unification," the evolution of charging ports is a microcosm of EVs’ journey from niche to mainstream.
Would you like me to put together a country-specific EV charging connector comparison chart with a timeline for you to reference anytime?
Latest Updates
2026-02-02
Three Core Trends Driving Global EV Charging in 2025: Standardization, Openness, and Localization
This article overviews 2025 global EV charging trends across Europe, North America, and Southeast Asia. Europe leads via AFIR/EPBD policies; North America sees NACS standard unification and open networks; Southeast Asia thrives on localized innovation. Key trends: standardization, network openness, and localization. It offers insights for overseas clients on policy compliance, standard compatibility, and market entry.
2026-01-30
Why Communication Protocols Are the Unsung Heroes of EV Charging
This article unpacks 2026’s key EV charging communication protocols (ISO 15118-20, OCPP 2.0.1, etc.), decoding their 3-layer stack and global compliance mandates. It highlights interoperability breakthroughs like ChaoJi and UBC, offers deployment guides for manufacturers, CPOs and fleets, and previews AI/5G-driven future trends—critical for navigating the $37.61B charging infrastructure market.
2026-01-28
Middle East EV Charging Market Booms: Policy, Capital and Technology Forge a $10 Billion Track
The Middle East’s EV charging market is booming (25.3% CAGR, $1.437B by 2030), driven by UAE/Saudi policies, Sino-local cooperation, and rising local manufacturing. With intense network expansion and V2G deployment, it faces hurdles like low EV penetration and grid upgrade needs, but intelligentization and capital inflows pave the way for energy transition.